Uzeu copene:Arenasky/Mohammad Mohammadian

Orland's message

This is most likely autobiographical iw-spam. Article starter has deleted the link to it in WD and may thus have abandoned the article. See https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q85627863&action=history

See also:

Greetings, Orland (copene) 12 di setimbe 2021 a 08:58 (UTC)

Dear @Orland,

I will take a decision once the debate on "fr.wiki" finished. I don't know if this page was under discussion in order to know if they should delete it or not on "en.wiki" or "de.wiki", such as for the French-speaking project (I don't speak German, so I can't understand what those people write then). The link you provided for the English-speaking project only refer to two talk pages. I also know for sure this article was deleted in the Dutch-speaking project, but it has been kept in the Danish one after a debate that occured in May. Could you tell me more about the decision you take on both Bokmål- and Nynorsk-speaking Wikipedias?

Yours sincerely,

--Èl-Gueuye-Noere (Ene sacwè ? => Dijhoz-m' el !) 12 di setimbe 2021 a 10:28 (UTC)

Hello, Èl-Gueuye-Noere. The same thing happened at both dutch and norwegian Wikipedia: When the deletion process was opened, the user called for a speedy deletion of the article.

There is a discussion here where the speedy deletion is mentioned: no:Wikipedia:Sletting/Mohammad Mohammadian; and the same in dutch: nl:Wikipedia:Te beoordelen pagina's/Toegevoegd 20210906. (See also nl:Overleg gebruiker:Orland.) Greetings from Orland (copene) 12 di setimbe 2021 a 10:59 (UTC)

Final decision

Dear all: @ Arenasky, Orland, Lucyin and Reptilien,

The decision that is taken now concerning this article was difficult.

There are few elements that speak in the favour of its maintenance. Nevertheless, there are many elements that indicate this article should be deleted. People may find hereunder an abstract of both, pros and cons:
Pros:

1) Arenasky paid attention to people's advices on this project until now.

2) This article was saved on the Danish- and French-speaking Wikipedias.

3) This article has not been deleted on English- and German-speaking Wikipedias yet, even though discussions are going on.

Cons:

1) Arenasky defends the article in an extremely clumsy way. He seems to have troubles to know exactly how Wikipedia projects work.

2) This article has been already deleted in several languages. For instance, the Dutch-, Norsk- and Bokmål-projects have completely deleted this article. It seems Arenasky has requested their deletion.

3) This article were, and even still is, under discussion in a lot of projects at the same time.

4) This article has been deleted in several projects: 07/09/2021 = 44 entries => 25/09/2021 = 22 entries.

5) Arenasky is blocked on the German-speaking project.

6) Arenasky is blamed for deleting other users' responses.

7) The picture, which depicts Mohammad Mohammadian, is under discussion on Wikimedia.

This article ought to be deleted. Nevertheless, a draft like this – Uzeu:Arenasky/Mohammad Mohammadian – ought to be created. This article ought to be recreated, only if the content and the sources suffice to demonstrate its appropriateness. The recreation, so to speak, of this article can only be done by one of the manaedjeus of the Walloon-speaking project: in others words either by Lucyin or Èl-Gueuye-Noere. It is not necessary to block the creation, because the article has not been vandalised yet. Although Arenasky has confessed to vandalise, this misdemeanour has not been cleary proved yet. That is the reason why Arenasky ought not to be blocked. As it is written earlier, hardly anybody can recreate this article. This decision foresees sanctions for those who break this measure:


	Everyone except Arenasky	Arenasky only
Once	Called to order	Blocked six months
Twice	Blocked six months	Blocked one year + Reported to higher authority
Three times or more	Doubled	Doubled

This measure will be implemented on 09/10/2021 13:00 UTC+1, provided three people out of five vote hereinbelow in favour of, or are not against it. Please, if anyone objects this measure, this person ought to feel free to inform everyone below:

Oyi : See proposal. --Èl-Gueuye-Noere (Ene sacwè ? => Dijhoz-m' el !) 25 di setimbe 2021 a 10:42 (UTC)
Dji n' so nén disconte di fé come çoula. Mins oniesmint, por mi gn a nén assez d' sourdant po poleur dire ki l' ome est foirt rilomé. Adon, djel disfaçreu ! Après, vos froz come vos vloz ! Reptilien.19831209BE1 (copene) 25 di setimbe 2021 a 15:46 (UTC)
L' årtike va bén esse disfacé, si èm-n' atåvla rote. Çki dji va fé, c' est askepyî on batch å savlon po k' l' uzeu ricandje ès-n' årtike. On va askepyî co on côp l' årtike seulmint si çki nos dmandans serè didins. Dj' ô bén les sourdants eyet l' astoca di ricnoxhance ([FR] notoriété). --Èl-Gueuye-Noere (Ene sacwè ? => Dijhoz-m' el !) 26 di setimbe 2021 a 20:10 (UTC)
Mins, Èl-Gueuye-Noere, comint voloz vs ki l' ome (l' uzeu) amidere l' årtike adon k' i n' djåze nén walon...? Si Mohammad Mohammadian est rlomé assez, metans dins 5 ans, adon, c' est a nozôtes di fé çou k' i fåt po rmete l' årtike a s' plaece, avou les sourdants et les racsegnes ki vont bén, nén l' uzeu ki n' djåze nén walon. Mi djel disfaçreu (pol moumint), et come il est possûle di fé raviker èn årtike k' a stî disfacé, i srè co tins del fé. I gn a ddja nén assez a fé so Wikipedia, et ls ôtes pordjets, la k' on n' est k' 3-4 a bouter dssus ? Di pus ki, si dj' a bén tot comprins, Arenasky a dmandé lu-minme so d'ôtes pordjets di disfacer l' pådje. Mins come djel a dit, vos froz bén çou k' vos vloz. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (copene) 28 di setimbe 2021 a 12:17 (UTC)
Dji vou bén l' ratourner si, eyet seulmint si, l' årtike est podbon presse. Tot rwaitant Arenasky, dji n' sai nén s' i comprind comint ça rote. Dji lu leye, co asteure (mins a-z aveuri a l' avni), el « benefice-di-dotance ». Come vozôtes eto, dji vôreu bén k' cisse istwere ci s' finixhe. Yeyet, c' est l' veur k' nos avans d' ôtès sacwès a fé so nos pordjets. --Èl-Gueuye-Noere (Ene sacwè ? => Dijhoz-m' el !) 28 di setimbe 2021 a 21:39 (UTC)